Arc Health

For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right

Mar 13, 2019 | Native American Health

Part of a series on the structural determinants of health disparities affecting the most underserved communities.

Authored by Phuoc Le, MD and Sam Aptekar

 

Most will be surprised to learn that American Indians and Alaska Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares, “everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including…medical care and necessary social services,” U.S. federal policy only guarantees this human right to enrolled tribal members. The source of this juridical entitlement is what the United States Supreme Court has defined as the federal trust responsibility.

Between 1787 and 1871, the United States signed nearly 400 treaties with Indian tribes, in which, for the exchange of millions of acres of tribal land, the U.S. government promised in perpetuity to respect their sovereignty and provide benefits, including housing, education, and healthcare. Argued in March 1983, United States v. Mitchell is the most recent Supreme Court case establishing this principle as a matter of law. This week marks the 36-year-anniversary of that seminal case, providing us the opportunity to discuss the federal government’s failure to adequately fund the healthcare institutions that serve American Indians and Alaska Natives despite its legal responsibility to do so.

Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall penned the majority opinion of United States v. Mitchell.

The current life expectancy for American Indians and Alaska Natives is 73 years, 5.5 years less than that of the general population. American Indians die at higher rates from heart disease, cancer, diabetes, stroke, and kidney disease. When we consider why Native communities suffer from preventable and treatable diseases at disproportionate frequencies, we must first evaluate the inequity in Congressional funding for Indian Health Services (IHS), the national agency within the Department of Health and Human Services that is responsible for providing comprehensive healthcare to the country’s enrolled American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Based on the most recent available data, per capita spending on Indian Health Services is far lower than any other federal health care agency, including Medicare, Medicaid, and the Bureau of Prisons. In 2016, Congress invested $3,337 per capita on Indian health care, compared to $5,000 on prisoners and $12,744 on Medicare beneficiaries. For anyone intent on remedying the perpetuation of chronic health disparities that afflict Native communities, Congress’ stark underfunding of IHS should be prioritized rectification.

Date Source: The National Tribal Budget Formulation Workgroup’s Recommendations of the Indian Health Service Fiscal Year 2019 Budget

According to a report published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress, “Over the past 300 years, Native Americans have traded hundreds of millions of acres to the federal government in exchange for benefits to guarantee the survival and integrity of their tribes, including health care.” So why does the only population in the United States with a guarantee to healthcare at birth suffer from preventable diseases at grossly disproportionate rates? There is no easy answer to this question as it is both morally and legally reprehensible.

If we, as physicians, wish to see the actualization of the historical promises made by the U.S. government to its American Indian citizens, we must be aware of, and speak up for, the urgent need for increased funding to IHS. To be sure, this is not where the fight ends; more equitable health outcomes will only occur if we also target systemic inequality in housing, education, and income, but it is certainly a starting point we can all rally behind.

 

 

 

 

[1] There is no universally agreed-upon term for the first peoples of North America. In his influential 1998 essay, “I Am an American Indian, Not a Native American!” South Dakota activist Russel Means denounced “Native American” as a “generic government term used to describe all the indigenous prisoners of the United States.” Other activists, however, have provided differing perspectives. Ultimately, the decision lies with individuals among these communities. However, the authors of this post have selected the imperfect term “American Indian” because of its legal implications; at a 1977 United Nations conference in Geneva, the Native representatives unanimously elected the use of “American Indian,” which now predominates in legal settings.

Share this:

2 Comments

  1. DAVE HENRY

    With a large percentage of Native Americans on Medicare and Medicaid, how does that get calculated into the amount of dollars spent on their healthcare?

    Reply
    • Mark Lindley

      There is an active push by the IHS facilities to enroll Native Americans into both programs if eligible. They are as entitled to these benefits as all Americans are. Every dollar of reimbursement frees up dollars for care for others. It is one way to augment the inadequacy of the IHS budget

      Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – Health Econ Bot - […] Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the…
  2. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – Site Title - […] Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the…
  3. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – BrighterLife - […] Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the…
  4. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – Health News - […] Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the…
  5. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – Health News - […] [1] There is no universally agreed-upon term for the first peoples of North America. In his influential 1998 essay, “I…
  6. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – Techno Hub - […] Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the…
  7. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – Health Benefits - […] Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the…
  8. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right – Health - […] Natives represent the only populations in the United States with a legal birthright to health care.[1] Even though Article 25 of the…
  9. For American Indians, Health is a Human and Legal Right | Gaiasvegan - […] Natives signify the one populations in the US with a authorized birthright to well being care.[1] Though Article 25 of the UN’s…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.